default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID25. JURIX 2012: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Burkhard Schäfer:
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2012: The Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 17-19 December 2012. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 250, IOS Press 2012, ISBN 978-1-61499-166-3 - Michal Araszkiewicz
, Jaromír Savelka:
Refined Coherence as Constraint Satisfaction Framework for Representing Judicial Reasoning. 1-10 - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon:
What Makes a System a Legal Expert? 11-20 - Guido Boella, Luigi Di Caro, Leonardo Lesmo, Daniele Rispoli, Livio Robaldo:
Multi-label Classification of Legislative Text into EuroVoc. 21-30 - William J. Buchanan, Lu Fan, Alistair Lawson, Burkhard Schafer, Russel Scott, Christoph Thuemmler, Omair Uthmani:
Computational data protection law: trusting each other offline and online. 31-40 - Enrico Francesconi:
Supporting Transnational Judicial Procedures between European Member States: the e-Codex Project. 41-50 - Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri, Antonino Rotolo, Simone Scannapieco:
Narrowing Legal Concepts. 51-60 - Shumpei Kubosawa, Youwei Lu, Shogo Okada, Katsumi Nitta:
Argument Analysis with Factor Annotation Tool. 61-70 - QingYin Liang, Bin Wei:
An argumentation model of evidential reasoning with variable degrees of justification. 71-80 - Collin F. Lynch, Kevin D. Ashley, Mohammad Hassan Falakmasir:
Comparing Argument Diagrams. 81-90 - Jean-Henry Morin, Olivier Glassey:
ThinkData: a Data Protection and Transparency Awareness Service based on Storytelling. 91-94 - Marc van Opijnen:
Citation Analysis and Beyond: in Search of Indicators Measuring Case Law Importance. 95-104 - Gordon J. Pace, Fernando Schapachnik:
Types of Rights in Two-Party Systems: A Formal Analysis. 105-114 - Prakash Poudyal, Paulo Quaresma:
An hybrid approach for legal information extraction. 115-118 - Henry Prakken:
Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC+ framework. 119-128 - Shashishekar Ramakrishna, Naouel Karam, Adrian Paschke:
The FSTP Test: a novel approach for an invention's non-obviousness analysis. 129-132 - Livio Robaldo, Leonardo Lesmo, Daniele Paolo Radicioni:
Compiling Regular Expressions to Extract Legal Modifications. 133-141 - Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer, Tom M. van Engers:
Analysis of legal narratives: a conceptual framework. 143-146 - Akos Szoke, András Förhécz, György Strausz:
A Unified Change Management of Regulations and their Formal Representations based on the FRBR Framework and the Direct Method. 147-156 - Radboud Winkels, Rinke Hoekstra:
Automatic Extraction of Legal Concepts and Definitions. 157-166 - Adam Z. Wyner, Maya Wardeh, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson:
A Model-Based Critique Tool for Policy Deliberation. 167-176 - Adam Z. Wyner, Johan Bos, Valerio Basile, Paulo Quaresma:
An Empirical Approach to the Semantic Representation of Laws. 177-180
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-10-30 20:19 CET by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
