


Остановите войну!
for scientists:
Henry Prakken
Person information

Refine list

refinements active!
zoomed in on ?? of ?? records
view refined list in
export refined list as
showing all ?? records
2020 – today
- 2022
- [j55]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij:
Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs. Argument Comput. 13(1): 49-91 (2022) - 2021
- [j54]Henry Prakken
:
A formal analysis of some factor- and precedent-based accounts of precedential constraint. Artif. Intell. Law 29(4): 559-585 (2021) - [j53]Remi Wieten
, Floris Bex
, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij:
Information graphs and their use for Bayesian network graph construction. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 136: 249-280 (2021) - [c94]Henry Prakken
:
Philosophical Reflections on Argument Strength and Gradual Acceptability. ECSQARU 2021: 144-158 - [c93]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken:
On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. ICAIL 2021: 175-179 - [c92]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken:
Can Predictive Justice Improve the Predictability and Consistency of Judicial Decision-Making? JURIX 2021: 207-214 - 2020
- [j52]Henry Prakken:
A new use case for argumentation support tools: supporting discussions of Bayesian analyses of complex criminal cases. Artif. Intell. Law 28(1): 27-49 (2020) - [j51]Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Floris Bex, Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
, Bart Verheij:
In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law. Artif. Intell. Law 28(3): 281-326 (2020) - [j50]Zeynep Akata, Dan Balliet, Maarten de Rijke
, Frank Dignum, Virginia Dignum
, Guszti Eiben, Antske Fokkens
, Davide Grossi
, Koen V. Hindriks
, Holger H. Hoos, Hayley Hung, Catholijn M. Jonker, Christof Monz, Mark A. Neerincx, Frans A. Oliehoek
, Henry Prakken, Stefan Schlobach
, Linda C. van der Gaag, Frank van Harmelen
, Herke van Hoof, Birna van Riemsdijk, Aimee van Wynsberghe, Rineke Verbrugge, Bart Verheij
, Piek Vossen
, Max Welling:
A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Computer 53(8): 18-28 (2020) - [j49]Henry Prakken
, Floris Bex, Anne Ruth Mackor:
Editors' Review and Introduction: Models of Rational Proof in Criminal Law. Top. Cogn. Sci. 12(4): 1053-1067 (2020) - [j48]Henry Prakken:
An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case. Top. Cogn. Sci. 12(4): 1068-1091 (2020) - [j47]Alejandro Javier García, Henry Prakken
, Guillermo Ricardo Simari
:
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 20(3): 358-390 (2020) - [c91]Henry Prakken:
On Validating Theories of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: The Case of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks. CMNA@COMMA 2020: 21-30 - [c90]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
:
Deductive and Abductive Reasoning with Causal and Evidential Information. COMMA 2020: 383-394 - [e2]Henry Prakken, Stefano Bistarelli, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi:
Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2020, Perugia, Italy, September 4-11, 2020. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 326, IOS Press 2020, ISBN 978-1-64368-106-1 [contents]
2010 – 2019
- 2019
- [c89]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
:
Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Labeled Arguments. ECSQARU 2019: 99-110 - [c88]Henry Prakken:
Modelling Accrual of Arguments in ASPIC+. ICAIL 2019: 103-112 - [c87]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
:
Supporting Discussions About Forensic Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. ICAIL 2019: 143-152 - [c86]Henry Prakken:
Comparing Alternative Factor- and Precedent-Based Accounts of Precedential Constraint. JURIX 2019: 73-82 - [i4]Alejandro Javier García, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP. CoRR abs/1909.02810 (2019) - 2018
- [j46]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Corrigendum to "A general account of argumentation with preferences" [Artif. Intell. 195 (2013) 361-397]. Artif. Intell. 263: 107-110 (2018) - [c85]Henry Prakken, Michiel De Winter:
Abstraction in Argumentation: Necessary but Dangerous. COMMA 2018: 85-96 - [c84]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
:
Exploiting Causality in Constructing Bayesian Network Graphs from Legal Arguments. JURIX 2018: 151-160 - [c83]Henry Prakken:
Probabilistic Strength of Arguments with Structure. KR 2018: 158-167 - [i3]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences. CoRR abs/1804.06763 (2018) - 2017
- [j45]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Tom M. van Engers
, Bart Verheij
:
Introduction to the special issue on Artificial Intelligence for Justice (AI4J). Artif. Intell. Law 25(1): 1-3 (2017) - [j44]Henry Prakken:
On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law. Artif. Intell. Law 25(3): 341-363 (2017) - [j43]Katie Atkinson, Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin, Anthony Hunter
, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed
, Guillermo Ricardo Simari, Matthias Thimm, Serena Villata:
Towards Artificial Argumentation. AI Mag. 38(3): 25-36 (2017) - [j42]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Abstract Rule-Based Argumentation. FLAP 4(8) (2017) - [j41]Henry Prakken:
Historical Overview of Formal Argumentation. FLAP 4(8) (2017) - [j40]Sjoerd T. Timmer
, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 80: 475-494 (2017) - [c82]Remi Wieten, Floris Bex, Linda C. van der Gaag, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
:
Refining a Heuristic for Constructing Bayesian Networks from Structured Arguments. BNCAI 2017: 32-45 - [c81]Henry Prakken:
On Relating Abstract and Structured Probabilistic Argumentation: A Case Study. ECSQARU 2017: 69-79 - [c80]Henry Prakken:
On making autonomous vehicles respect traffic law: a case study for dutch law. ICAIL 2017: 241-244 - [c79]Henry Prakken:
Argument Schemes for Discussing Bayesian Modellings of Complex Criminal Cases. JURIX 2017: 69-78 - 2016
- [j39]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
A method for explaining Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenarios. Artif. Intell. Law 24(3): 285-324 (2016) - [j38]Bin Wei, Henry Prakken:
An analysis of critical-link semantics with variable degrees of justification. Argument Comput. 7(1): 35-53 (2016) - [j37]Diana Grooters, Henry Prakken:
Two Aspects of Relevance in Structured Argumentation: Minimality and Paraconsistency. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 56: 197-245 (2016) - [c78]Henry Prakken:
Rethinking the Rationality Postulates for Argumentation-Based Inference. COMMA 2016: 419-430 - 2015
- [j36]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
:
Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective. Artif. Intell. 227: 214-245 (2015) - [j35]Henry Prakken, Adam Z. Wyner
, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Katie Atkinson:
A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in ASPIC+. J. Log. Comput. 25(5): 1141-1166 (2015) - [c77]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation. ECSQARU 2015: 83-92 - [c76]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
A structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. ICAIL 2015: 109-118 - [c75]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
Constructing and understanding Bayesian networks for legal evidence with scenario schemes. ICAIL 2015: 128-137 - [c74]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
Demonstration of a structure-guided approach to capturing bayesian reasoning about legal evidence in argumentation. ICAIL 2015: 233-234 - [c73]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Explaining Legal Bayesian Networks Using Support Graphs. JURIX 2015: 121-130 - [c72]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Representing the Quality of Crime Scenarios in a Bayesian Network. JURIX 2015: 131-140 - [c71]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Capturing Critical Questions in Bayesian Network Fragments: - Extended abstract. JURIX 2015: 173-176 - [p6]Henry Prakken:
Formalising Debates About Law-Making Proposals as Practical Reasoning. Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking 2015: 301-321 - 2014
- [j34]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation. Artif. Intell. Law 22(4): 375-421 (2014) - [j33]Philippe Besnard, Alejandro Javier García, Anthony Hunter
, Sanjay Modgil
, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari, Francesca Toni
:
Introduction to structured argumentation. Argument Comput. 5(1): 1-4 (2014) - [j32]Sanjay Modgil
, Henry Prakken:
The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument Comput. 5(1): 31-62 (2014) - [c70]Diana Grooters, Henry Prakken:
Combining Paraconsistent Logic with Argumentation. COMMA 2014: 301-312 - [c69]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij
:
A Tool for the Generation of Arguments from Bayesian Networks. COMMA 2014: 479-480 - [c68]Henry Prakken:
On support relations in abstract argumentation as abstractions of inferential relations. ECAI 2014: 735-740 - [c67]Sjoerd T. Timmer, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Extracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks. JURIX 2014: 71-80 - [c66]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Extracting Scenarios from a Bayesian Network as Explanations for Legal Evidence. JURIX 2014: 103-112 - 2013
- [j31]Sanjay Modgil
, Henry Prakken:
A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artif. Intell. 195: 361-397 (2013) - [j30]Floris Bex, Sanjay Modgil
, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed
:
On logical specifications of the Argument Interchange Format. J. Log. Comput. 23(5): 951-989 (2013) - [c65]Henry Prakken, Dan Ionita, Roel J. Wieringa:
Risk Assessment as an Argumentation Game. CLIMA 2013: 357-373 - [c64]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Representing and Evaluating Legal Narratives with Subscenarios in a Bayesian Network. CMN 2013: 315-332 - [c63]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken, Adam Z. Wyner
, Katie Atkinson:
Argument schemes for reasoning with legal cases using values. ICAIL 2013: 13-22 - [c62]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Modeling crime scenarios in a Bayesian network. ICAIL 2013: 150-159 - [c61]Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken, Adam Z. Wyner
:
Argumentation Schemes for Reasoning about Factors with Dimensions. JURIX 2013: 39-48 - [c60]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
:
Formalising arguments about norms. JURIX 2013: 121-130 - [c59]Charlotte S. Vlek, Henry Prakken, Silja Renooij
, Bart Verheij:
Unfolding Crime Scenarios with Variations: A Method for Building a Bayesian Network for Legal Narratives. JURIX 2013: 145-154 - 2012
- [j29]Henry Prakken:
Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics. Artif. Intell. Law 20(1): 57-82 (2012) - [j28]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Michal Araszkiewicz
, Kevin D. Ashley, Katie Atkinson, Floris Bex, Filipe Borges, Danièle Bourcier, Paul Bourgine, Jack G. Conrad, Enrico Francesconi, Thomas F. Gordon, Guido Governatori
, Jochen L. Leidner
, David D. Lewis, Ronald Prescott Loui, L. Thorne McCarty, Henry Prakken, Frank Schilder, Erich Schweighofer, Paul Thompson, Alex Tyrrell, Bart Verheij, Douglas N. Walton, Adam Z. Wyner:
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law. Artif. Intell. Law 20(3): 215-319 (2012) - [j27]Henry Prakken, John F. Horty:
An appreciation of John Pollock's work on the computational study of argument. Argument Comput. 3(1): 1-19 (2012) - [j26]Bas van Gijzel, Henry Prakken:
Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. Argument Comput. 3(1): 21-47 (2012) - [c58]Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Testing the benfits of structured argumentation in multi-agent deliberation dialogues. AAMAS 2012: 1411-1412 - [c57]Henry Prakken:
Some Reflections on Two Current Trends in Formal Argumentation. Logic Programs, Norms and Action 2012: 249-272 - [c56]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Resolutions in Structured Argumentation. COMMA 2012: 310-321 - [c55]Henry Prakken, Sanjay Modgil:
Clarifying some misconceptions on the ASPIC+ framework. COMMA 2012: 442-453 - [c54]Henry Prakken:
Formalising a legal opinion on a legislative proposal in the ASPIC+ framework. JURIX 2012: 119-128 - 2011
- [c53]Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Multi-criteria Argument Selection in Persuasion Dialogues. ArgMAS 2011: 136-153 - [c52]Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Multi-criteria argument selection in persuasion dialogues. AAMAS 2011: 921-928 - [c51]Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
A Methodology for the Generation of Multi-agent Argumentation Dialogue Scenarios. EUMAS 2011: 160-174 - [c50]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken, Wietske Visser:
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. ICAIL 2011: 21-30 - [c49]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation. IJCAI 2011: 1021-1026 - [c48]Bas van Gijzel, Henry Prakken:
Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation. IJCAI 2011: 1113-1119 - [c47]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
:
On modelling burdens and standards of proof in structured argumentation. JURIX 2011: 83-92 - 2010
- [j25]Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij:
A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artif. Intell. Law 18(2): 123-152 (2010) - [j24]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken:
Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artif. Intell. Law 18(2): 153-174 (2010) - [j23]Roger Azevedo, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Gautam Biswas, Ted Carmichael, Nancy L. Green, Mirsad Hadzikadic, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Unmesh Kurup, Simon Parsons, Roberto Pirrone, Henry Prakken, Alexei V. Samsonovich
, Donia Scott, Richard Souvenir:
Reports of the AAAI 2009 Fall Symposia. AI Mag. 31(1): 88-94 (2010) - [j22]Henry Prakken:
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument Comput. 1(2): 93-124 (2010) - [c46]Eric M. Kok, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
A Formal Argumentation Framework for Deliberation Dialogues. ArgMAS 2010: 31-48 - [c45]Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Arguing about Preferences and Decisions. ArgMAS 2010: 68-85 - [c44]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Chris Reed
:
A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. COMMA 2010: 99-110 - [c43]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Reasoning about Preferences in Structured Extended Argumentation Frameworks. COMMA 2010: 347-358 - [c42]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken:
A lightweight formal model of two-phase democratic deliberation. JURIX 2010: 27-36
2000 – 2009
- 2009
- [j21]Jürgen Dix, Simon Parsons, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
Research challenges for argumentation. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 23(1): 27-34 (2009) - [j20]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken:
Editorial: Logic and Law Corner. J. Log. Comput. 19(6): 899 (2009) - [c41]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Simon Parsons, Henry Prakken:
Preface. AAAI Fall Symposium: The Uses of Computational Argumentation 2009 - [c40]Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Practical Reasoning Using Values. ArgMAS 2009: 79-93 - [c39]Sindhu Joseph, Henry Prakken:
Coherence-driven argumentation to norm consensus. ICAIL 2009: 58-67 - [c38]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken:
A case study of hypothetical and value-based reasoning in US Supreme-Court cases. JURIX 2009: 11-20 - [p5]Henry Prakken:
Models of Persuasion Dialogue. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2009: 281-300 - [p4]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
Argumentation in Legal Reasoning. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2009: 363-382 - 2008
- [j19]Henry Prakken:
A formal model of adjudication dialogues. Artif. Intell. Law 16(3): 305-328 (2008) - [j18]Henry Prakken:
Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study. Artif. Intell. Law 16(4): 333-359 (2008) - [j17]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Henry Prakken:
Introducing the Logic and Law Corner. J. Log. Comput. 18(1): 1-12 (2008) - [c37]Thomas L. van der Weide, Frank Dignum, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. ArgMAS 2008: 3-18 - [c36]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken:
Investigating Stories in a Formal Dialogue Game. COMMA 2008: 73-84 - [c35]Sanjay Modgil, Henry Prakken:
Applying Preferences to Dialogue Graphs. COMMA 2008: 252-263 - [c34]Régis Riveret, Henry Prakken, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor:
Heuristics in Argumentation: A Game Theory Investigation. COMMA 2008: 324-335 - [c33]Susan W. van den Braak, Herre van Oostendorp, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken:
The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. ICLS (3) 2008: 143-144 - [c32]Henry Prakken:
Combining Modes of Reasoning: An Application of Abstract Argumentation. JELIA 2008: 349-361 - [c31]Susan W. van den Braak
, Herre van Oostendorp, Henry Prakken, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. JURIX 2008: 160-169 - [c30]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
More on Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. JURIX 2008: 176-185 - [e1]Jürgen Dix, Simon Parsons, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
Perspectives Workshop: Theory and Practice of Argumentation Systems, 20.01. - 23.01.2008. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 08042, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany 2008 [contents] - [i2]Jürgen Dix, Simon Parsons, Henry Prakken, Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
Research Challenges for Argumentation. Perspectives Workshop: Theory and Practice of Argumentation Systems 2008 - 2007
- [j16]Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Douglas Walton:
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15): 875-896 (2007) - [c29]Floris J. Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij:
Formalising argumentative story-based analysis of evidence. ICAIL 2007: 1-10 - [c28]Susan W. van den Braak
, Gerard Vreeswijk, Henry Prakken:
AVERs: an argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. ICAIL 2007: 11-15 - [c27]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
:
Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. ICAIL 2007: 97-106 - [c26]Pieter Dijkstra, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh:
An implementation of norm-based agent negotiation. ICAIL 2007: 167-175 - [c25]Jobien Sombekke, Tom M. van Engers
, Henry Prakken:
Argumentation structures in legal dossiers. ICAIL 2007: 277-281 - [c24]Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Henry Prakken, Bram Roth:
Success chances in argument games: a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. JURIX 2007: 99-108 - 2006
- [j15]Henry Prakken:
Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 21(2): 163-188 (2006) - [c23]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken:
Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. COMMA 2006: 247-258 - [c22]Henry Prakken:
Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. COMMA 2006: 311-322 - [c21]Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Bart Verhey:
Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence. JURIX 2006: 11-20 - [c20]Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor:
Presumptions and Burdens of Proof. JURIX 2006: 21-30 - [p3]Henry Prakken:
Artificial Intelligence & Law, Logic and Argument Schemes. Arguing on the Toulmin Model 2006: 231-245 - 2005
- [j14]Pieter Dijkstra, Floris Bex, Henry Prakken, Kees de Vey Mestdagh:
Towards a multi-agent system for regulated information exchange in crime investigations.