


default search action
13. ICAIL 2011: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Kevin D. Ashley, Tom M. van Engers:

The 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-10, 2011, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. ACM 2011, ISBN 978-1-4503-0755-0 - Adam Z. Wyner

, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
, Katie Atkinson:
Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. 1-10 - Floris Bex, Bart Verheij:

Legal shifts in the process of proof. 11-20 - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

, Henry Prakken, Wietske Visser:
Argument schemes for two-phase democratic deliberation. 21-30 - Guido Governatori

:
On the relationship between Carneades and Defeasible Logic. 31-40 - John F. Horty:

Reasons and precedent. 41-50 - Thomas F. Gordon:

Analyzing open source license compatibility issues with Carneades. 51-55 - Nancy L. Green:

Causal argumentation schemes to support sense-making in clinical genetics and law. 56-60 - Michal Chalamish, Dov M. Gabbay, Uri J. Schild:

Intelligent evaluation of evidence using Wigmore diagrams. 61-65 - Susan W. van den Braak

, Anne Sonnenschein, Sunil Choenni, Paul R. Smit:
A method for explaining and predicting trends: an application to the Dutch justice system. 66-70 - Régis Riveret

, Antonino Rotolo, Giuseppe Contissa
, Giovanni Sartor, Wamberto Weber Vasconcelos
:
Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation. 71-80 - Katie Atkinson, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon

, Dan Cartwright, Adam Z. Wyner
:
Semantic models for policy deliberation. 81-90 - Jenny Eriksson Lundström, Giacomo Aceto, Andreas Hamfelt:

Towards a dynamic metalogic implementation of legal argumentation. 91-95 - Tomasz Zurek

:
Modelling of a fortiori reasoning. 96-100 - Michal Araszkiewicz

:
Analogy, similarity and factors. 101-105 - Marc Lauritsen:

Intelligent tools for managing legal choices. 106-110 - Tommaso Agnoloni

, Enrico Francesconi:
Modelling semantic profiles in legislative documents for enhanced norm accessibility. 111-115 - Mihai Surdeanu, Ramesh Nallapati, George Gregory, Joshua Walker, Christopher D. Manning

:
Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation. 116-120 - Hajime Yoshino:

The systematization of law in terms of the validity. 121-125 - Robert C. Richards Jr., Thomas R. Bruce:

Adapting specialized legal metadata to the digital environment: the code of federal regulations parallel table of authorities and rules. 126-130 - Monica Palmirani

, Guido Governatori
, Giuseppe Contissa
:
Modelling temporal legal rules. 131-135 - John Zeleznikow

, Emilia Bellucci:
Classifying online dispute resolution through a comparison of family mediation and the Israel - Palestinian conflict. 136-140 - Jeroen Keppens

:
On extracting arguments from Bayesian network representations of evidential reasoning. 141-150 - Edwina L. Rissland, Xiaoxi Xu:

Catching Gray Cygnets: an initial exploration. 151-160 - Matthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley:

Facilitating case comparison using value judgments and intermediate legal concepts. 161-170 - Alexander Boer, Tom M. van Engers

:
An agent-based legal knowledge acquisition methodology for agile public administration. 171-180 - Matthew Carey

:
Modeling authority commitments in two search and seizure cases. 181-188 - Monica Palmirani, Marcello Ceci

, Daniele Paolo Radicioni
, Alessandro Mazzei:
FrameNet model of the suspension of norms. 189-193 - Brooke Abrahams, Peter Condliffe, John Zeleznikow

:
Using an OWL ontology to support legal negotiation about owners corporation disputes. 194-198 - Michael Curtotti, Eric McCreath:

A corpus of Australian contract language: description, profiling and analysis. 199-208 - Max R. Kimbrough, Steven O. Kimbrough, Priscilla Murphy:

On using text analytics for event studies. 209-218 - Cameron Hughes, Tracey Hughes, Alina Lazar:

Discovering coherence and justification clusters in digital transcripts using epistemic analysis. 219-223 - Davide Carneiro

, Paulo Novais
, Francisco Andrade
, José Neves
:
Retrieving information in online dispute resolution platforms: a hybrid method. 224-228 - Bruce M. McLaren, Kevin D. Ashley:

Can temporal representation and reasoning make a difference in automated legal reasoning?: lessons from an AI-based ethical reasoner. 229-238 - Jack G. Conrad, Christopher Dozier, Hugo Molina-Salgado, Merine Thomas, Sriharsha Veeramachaneni:

Public record aggregation using semi-supervised entity resolution. 239-248 - Manisha Verma, Vasudeva Varma

:
Applying key phrase extraction to aid invalidity search. 249-255

manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.


Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID














